Can
We Talk in Person?
Today’s
technology has become vitally important in today’s society for its rapid
connections to the social world and connecting people around the world.
Currently, technology has advanced so rapidly and changed the way people have
been able to communicate with their peers. Communicating with people is possible
through technology because of the various ways of interaction such as: Skype,
texting, and other technological devices. In addition, technology continues to
be modified and frequently used for people to continue communicating with their
friends, families, colleagues, business associates, etc. in matter of seconds
without actually speaking face-to-face. However, the problem is the more people
try to interact with their peers through technology; there will be less
interest in forming close, personal interactions and relationships with each
other. Even though technology has influenced people to various access of
communication through technology, it negatively affects how people maintain
relationships because of the lack of face-to-face communication.
People
have forgotten the traditional way to communicate through face to face
communication because technology has alternatives to have personal
interactions. Communicating through technology is not the same as interacting
face-to-face, thus misunderstanding messages between them. The article “The
Lost Art of Face-to-Face Communication” by Stacey Hanke, owner of 1stImpression Consulting, Inc. states that sometimes when using technology to converse, “there is no emotional connection towards the other person to understand the tone, inflection, or emotion that is carried with the words” (para.4).
Hanke reports that when people use technology like cellphones people do not
understand the in-depth meaning of the message; instead focus on the broad
topic. She affirms that communicating through technology may cause
misinterpretations of the emotional meaning through conversations, thus
creating a problem trying to understand each other throughout the personal
interaction. Hanke verifies that conversing with someone face-to-face; more
attention and focus is displayed in the person speaking because of their
emotions, language, and the face-t-to-face interaction. In addition,
interacting with technology interferes with people communicating verbally and
connecting on a personal, intimate level. Avoiding personal, face-to-face
communication affects the chances of close relationships forming and succeeding.
Recently, there was a picture on the Internet where a young lady is reaching
out her hand to shake a young man’s hand; meanwhile, his head is looking down
preoccupied with his cellphone. Below the picture, there is a caption that
reads in caps lock “Texting”, is more important than human contact” (“Texting
is More Important than Human Contact”1). The picture is commentary on technology
and communication and shows how people choose to communicate with their
electronic device instead of trying to interact with the person face-to-face. The
young man is a representation of society choosing to maintain connections and
“talk” through technology; while another part of society represent the young
lady who prefers interacting with the young man face-to-face. The image
reflects the negative outcome of replacing the significance of face-to-face
relations to associate with other people, because it shows the ignorance and
lack of interest technology allows people to interact towards each other.
Furthermore, overuse of technology may influence people to ignore the positive
outcomes of face-to-face communication.
Some
reports may claim technology is beneficial for people to communicate and become
in touch with each other as an alternative to physically seeing or speaking to
them. Such claim from the CSUN newspaper sundial published, “ProCon: Social Networking and Your Love Life” by Ira Caminong, states that “Social sites also allow for friendships to be maintained and old connections rekindled, because profiles give users the opportunity of connecting with distant friends and relatives in ways they couldn’t offline” (para.6). Caminong describes
technology as a new way to relate to each other and keep in touch with long
distant relatives. Ira supports that technology increases the many interactions
throughout the countless connections available in the Internet. She informs
that technology is beneficial to gain access with close peers and form
relationships. However, Caminong overlooks the failure of face-to-face
communication because interception of technology causes people to physically
ignore and talk to each other. Another contributor Naomi Ogaldez, observes
that, “People are not only behaving based on what they are learning from the media, but also through their use of social media” (para.5). She affirms that
technology is a form of a distraction towards progressing in relationships and
influences people to use it to their advantage and interrupting the use
face-to-face communication. People’s excessive use of technology interrupts traditional
communication because they learn multiple accesses of recent technological
advances that replace speaking to each other. Ogaldez informs that the
attention and focus on technological devices to interact with each other will
decrease face-to-face communication. However, there are ways traditional
communication prospers.
Face-to-face
communication implemented during personal socialization increases the
effectiveness of personal communication with others. The article posted by
Virginette Acacio, “The Benefits of Face-to-Face Communication” points out, “There’s a feeling of community because we’re better able to socialize and interact with one another.” “We quickly build a bond that sets the foundation for trust and ultimately, lasting business relationships” (para.4).
Acacio verifies that face-to-face communication is a necessity to forming
stronger relationships that technology cannot provide successfully. Using technology
can provide connectivity depending on distance but personal close relationships
are formed and valued while talking one on one with each other. Using various
technologies to connect with each other is not the same when socializing,
speaking and familiarizing with one another. People depend too much on technology
that they conform connecting from far away, which interrupts the ability to
adapt to face-to-face interaction. Building relationships begins through
verbal, close, and face-to-face contact which seems to fade because technology
replaces the emotional effects that a normal interaction would value.
Face-to-Face communication is fading throughout society and it should not be
ignored because as technology is used daily, people will grow apart from each
other while they stare and “connect” with technology.
Face-to-face
communication is decreasing the ability to connect with a person through
conversations. Technology offers people wide spread access to use their devices
to interact and form relationships. Relationships are in need of more talking
and socializing without the use of technology. Also, people that use technology
should know well enough that their relationships do not have to be through
technology, as it can sometimes fail. Interacting on a personal level is better
than using technology because people can easily understand each other and know
their true emotions. People that use technology are in charge of their own
lives and should be able to distinguish the differences between relationships
through technology and face-to-face communication. Face-to-face communication
provides special significance to associate instead of using symbols or others
“meaningful” symbols to form relationships. Traditional communication is an
important factor that creates closer bonds between people when trying to get
to know them. People take advantage of technology withholds from noticing
others as a barrier that blocks people from communicating. Communication is
effective when people talk to each other in situations that cannot be solved
through technology. However, as long as, technology increases the opportunity
to gain access to the outside world, at the same time people are losing their
personal interaction. Society has rapidly adjusted to various technological communication
accesses that do not seem to find an issue that face-to-face communicating is a
valued opportunity to create stronger, successful relationships or bonds.
If you have Herpes in your whole body such as fever blisters, hsv, or roofing shingles you know what it is like to stay with the pain and discomfort that herpes delivers. I don't need to tell you how awesome it would be to find something that works so well that you no longer need to fear about stress or outbreak,Dr Itua herbal medicine cure my herpes in two weeks of taking it.is genuine and natural herbal medicine it has no side effect, The reason I'm writing this is that I promised Dr Itua I will share his herbal work to the world to see Herpes is no more a big deal.also Dr Itua can as well cure the following diseases...HIV,Hsv 1/2,Hepatitis B,Cancer, Diabetes, Men/Woman Infertility, Scoliosis,Fibromyalgia,Fluoroquinolone Toxicity
ReplyDeleteSyndrome Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva.Fatal Familial Insomnia Facator V Leiden Mutation , Lottery Spell,Copd, Shingles,Fibroid, Fibromyalgia, Liver/Kidney Inflamotry, Epilepsy,Hpv,Weak Erection,Wart Remover,Cold Sore, Coeliac disease,Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease,Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Ataxia,Arthritis,Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,Alzheimer's disease,Adrenocortical carcinoma.Asthma,Allergic Asthma. Here His Contact...drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com/Whatsapp Phone.+2348149277976. I paid for his herbal medicine and sent it to me through Courier Service which I pick it urgently and used.